I don't know why, but I am completely obsessed with
supereponymous bands right now. Galvin got me into them. He's compiling this list of bands that have albums & songs named after themselves and it's all I think about.
"What about Menudo? Surely they had a song called "Soy Menudo," didn't they? I'll just go check on Amazon.com." I click on the site and see that they had a self-titled debut album (debut supereponymous efforts are the most prized). My heart skips a beat. Maybe this is the one. Scrolling down furiously, I race through the song titles, far too fast to actually read them, hoping to see Menudo there. "Hold Me," "You and Me All the Way," "Don't Hold Back..."
I re-read the list, more slowly this time, in case I've missed somthing.
Damn. Nothing.
What about the Backstreet Boys? They sound like the kind of band that would do this?
And so goes the next half an hour.
It's not just the thrill of the chase that has sucked me into this. It's contemplating the forces behind supereponymy. Are these just obvious marketing tactics (Strengthen the brand through repetition!), or are the supereponymous artists who, like me, are have driving obsessions they must realize.
Take Bad Company. They named their first album "Bad Company." And there's a song on the album called "Bad Company." Its first two lines?
Bad Company
Bad Company
The song goes on to explain that the singer was "born 6-gun in my hand," and that "behind a gun I'll make my final stand. That's why they call me bad company."
There's a cultural difference here that you have to understand. Bad Company was from England, where not even the police have handguns, and they recorded during a time and place where gun toting wasn't especially respected. So no doubt, the band's name sprang from a sense of alienation and rejection. Because of their gun obsession, they were, no doubt, considered "bad company" at parties and such in the British post-glam rock scene.
But the song goes deeper. "Rebel souls Deserters we are called." This obvious military reference indicates a sense of connection with some mythical group of military misfits (a "company"). Now we realize that the gun is not in Bad Company's hand out of aggression, but that it is a defense mechanism ("behind a gun."). Not something they chose, but something they had to do.
Obviously this was a central metaphor for ex-Free vocalist Paul Rodgers, who
recalls the fight he had with Swan Song Records (Led Zepplin's record company) to realize his vision. "I had to fight to get the management and the record company to accept the name Bad Company," explains Rodgers. "They thought it was a terrible name. Peter Grant called a meeting and the band met beforehand. I told them that I had been through this before with Free as Island Records had wanted to call us the Heavy Metal Kids. We agreed to go in and tell them that we were going to be called Bad Company and that was the end of the story. As soon as Peter heard how strongly I felt about the name, he became very supportive and turned the record company around."
Was the Bad Company name, further, an ironic swipe at the record company and the corporatization of Rock and Roll? The song goes on to say, "Tell me that you are not a thief? Oh, But I am." Would anyone other than a Bad Company come up with the name "Heavy Metal Kids?" By having a record, a band name, and a song all called Bad Company, Rogers and, er, company invite the music listener to contemplate these different levels of meaning, and to ultimately question how we arrive at these notions of "Bad" and "Good" at all.
As the song says, every act of artistic creation is, equally, an act of destruction: "Yeah We're Bad Company
Kill in cold blood."